THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HENDRIKUS H. T. M. KETELS and CINZIA A. RITA DI FEDE,
and HERMANNUS B. SAVENIJE
____________
Appeal No. 94-4034
Application No. 07/804,1601
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and WARREN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 5 through 14. The examiner has withdrawn
the rejection of claims 15 through 20 subsequent to the appeal.
See Answer, pages 2 and 4.
Claim 5 is representative of the subject matter on appeal
and reads as follows:
1Application for patent filed December 6, 1991.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007