THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte EDWARD S. YEUNG, LANCE B.
KOUTNY, BARRY L. HOGAN, KING
C. CHAN and YINFA MA
_____________
Appeal No. 94-4081
Application 07/750,0311
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 42-46, which are the only claims
1 Application for patent filed August 14, 1991. According to applicants,
the application is a division of Application 07/472,315, filed January 30, 1990,
now Patent Number 5,192,407, issued March 9, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007