THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MASAO OGAWA, TOSHIRO OHTSUBO and SHIGENORI TSUDA
____________
Appeal No. 94-4145
Application No. 07/882,2521
____________
HEARD: October 17, 1997
____________
Before SMITH, WEIFFENBACH, and PAK, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Masao Ogawa et al. (appellants) appeal from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 5, which are
all of the claims remaining in the application.
Claims 1 and 4 are representative of the subject matter
on appeal and read as follows:
1Application for patent filed May 8, 1992. According to
the appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/558,454, filed July 27, 1990.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007