THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte STEVEN A. HUNLEY
_______________
Appeal No. 95-0020
Application 08/052,2131
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 42 through 44 and 46. Claims 45, 47 and 48 have been
indicated by the examiner as being directed to allowable subject
matter but stand objected to as relying on a rejected base claim.
Claims 8, 10 through 19, 22, 24 through 29 and 31 through 41 have
been allowed.
1 Application for patent filed April 23, 1993. According to
appellant, this application is a continuation of Application
07/776,141, filed October 15, 1991.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007