THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte KOICHI NUMAZAWA, NORIKO YAMAKAWA, YOSHIICHI SUZUKI and ICHIRO KAWAMURA ________________ Appeal No. 95-0110 Application 07/953,7831 ________________ HEARD FEBRUARY 5, 1998 ________________ Before METZ, GARRIS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. METZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's refusal to allow claims 11 and 12, all the claims remaining in this application. Application for patent filed September 30, 1992. On this1 record, said application is stated to be a division of Serial Number 07/557,845, filed on July 25, 1990, and now U.S. Patent Number 5,207,946, issued May 4, 1993. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007