THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte SHINJI SHIMIZU and
MASAO KUMAGISHI
_____________
Appeal No. 95-0175
Application 07/894,1471
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before BARRETT, LEE and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 1-19. No claim has been allowed.
References relied on by the Examiner
Hernandez et al. 4,686,522 Aug. 11, 1987
(Hernandez)
Togawa et al. (Togawa) 4,953,225 Aug. 28, 1990
Sklarew 4,972,496 Nov. 20, 1990
1 Application for patent filed June 4, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007