THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ERNST O. DUEBER and LOUIS MULLER
____________
Appeal No. 95-0192
Application No. 07/914,2281
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, PAK and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s refusal
to allow claims 1 through 11, which are all of the claims
pending in the application. Claim 1 has been amended
subsequent to final rejection.
1Application for patent filed July 13, 1992. According
to the applicant, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/594,244, filed October 9, 1990, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007