THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte DANIEL GRAIVER and OSAMU TANAKA
________________
Appeal No. 95-0246
Application 07/990,2621
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before WINTERS, JOHN D. SMITH and WARREN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting
claims 1 through 13, 21 and 23, which are all of the claims
remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed December 11, 1992.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/439,751, filed November 21, 1989, now abandoned;
which is a continuation of Application 07/128,250, filed
December 3, 1987, now abandoned; which is a division of
Application 06/809,090, filed December 12, 1985, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007