THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte LARRY D. BOARDMAN and JOEL D. OXMAN
__________
Appeal No. 95-0331
Application No. 07/626,9041
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and WARREN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 2,
3, 5, 7-13, 15-17, 19, 20, 22, 24, 26-32, 34-36, 42, 43, 46-
51, 56, 57, 59, 61-63 and 65-87 . The only other claims2
1Application for patent filed December 13, 1990.
2Notwithstanding the examiner’s entry authorization (see
Paper No. 21), the amendment filed September 12, 1994 (see
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007