Appeal No. 95-0394
Application No. 08/065,786
operation on the numerical values read from
the memories and providing an output signal
dependent on the result of the operation.
The examiner relies on no references.
Claims 10-17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as
being directed to nonstatutory subject matter in the form of a
mathematical algorithm.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the
examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for
the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejection advanced by the examiner and the reasons
relied upon by the examiner as support for the rejection. We
have, likewise, reviewed and taken into consideration, in
reaching our decision, the appellant’s arguments set forth in
the brief along with the examiner’s rationale in support of
the rejection and arguments in rebuttal set forth in the
examiner’s answer.
It is our view, after consideration of the record
before us, that claims 10-17 are directed to statutory subject
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007