Appeal No. 95-0647
Application No. 08/026,246
amount resulting in the transmission of the display window at
a range of 70 to 90%,” and “[t]he Daiku patent is not
considered to fill in the essential gaps of the teaching of
the Hodges patent.” The 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claims
1, 5, 8, 10 and 13 is reversed.
The 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claims 2, 9 and 11 is
reversed because Maple does not cure the noted shortcomings in
the teachings of Hodges and Daiku.
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1, 2, 5, 8
through 11 and 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007