THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte DANIEL C. ROBBINS
_______________
Appeal No. 95-0794
Application 08/220,4061
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and KRASS, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1, 7, 8, 10, 17 and 20 through 24. Claims 2 through 6, 9,
11 through 16, 18 and 19 have been canceled.
The invention pertains to a portable computer that is
convertible between multiple operative positions. For example,
as shown in Figure 1, both the screen and keyboard
are viewable by a user but with the proper orientation and
1 Application for patent filed March 30, 1994. According to
appellant this application is a continuation of Application No.
07/994,856, filed December 22, 1992, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007