Ex parte OHASHI - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-0800                                                           
          Application 07/840,276                                                       

                    Claim 1 reads as follows:                                          
                    1.  A thin film magnetic head which comprises 2n (n                
          being an integer of not less than 1) spiral patterns formed by a             
          selective plating method, n spiral patterns out of the 2n spiral             
          patterns being connected in series so that a first connecting                
          terminal and an intermediate connecting terminal are formed to               
          thus give a first coil, the remaining n spiral patterns out of               
          the 2n spiral patterns being connected in series so that one end             
          thereof is connected to the intermediate connecting terminal and             
          the other end serves as a second connecting terminal to thus give            
          a second coil, wherein the 2n spiral patterns are formed on n                
          layers and each layer has two spiral patterns formed on the same             
          layer, one of which is a component of the first coil and the                 
          other of which is a component of the second coil.                            
                    The Examiner’s Answer cites the following prior art:               
          Romankiw et al. (Romankiw)    4,295,173       Oct. 13, 1981                  
          Takahashi                     4,416,056       Nov. 22, 1983                  
          Jones, Jr. et al. (Jones)     4,713,711       Dec. 15, 1987                  

                                       OPINION                                         
                    The claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as                 
          anticipated by Takahashi and under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                        
          unpatentable over Jones in view of Romankiw.                                 
          Anticipation by Takahashi                                                    
                    Appellants argue that Takahashi does not have “two                 
          spiral patterns formed on the same layer” as recited in the                  
          claims.  The examiner argues that one “layer” may be broadly                 
          interpreted to include multiple layers that are partially in the             
          same plane.  We agree with appellants.                                       


                                         -2-                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007