THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte WILLIAM E. SLACK
and HERSEL T. KEMP, II
_____________
Appeal No. 95-0801
Application 08/018,8301
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before GARRIS, OWENS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 6, which are
all the claims in this application.
According to appellants, the invention is directed to a
1 Application for patent filed February 18, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007