Appeal No. 95-0815 Application 07/963,967 any scientific reasoning why the ingredients in these compositions would be expected to mix in situ and still function as taught in the reference. Accordingly, the record before us supports the inference that the examiner has relied on information gleaned from appellants’ disclosure in formulating the grounds of rejection on appeal. Dow Chemical, supra; Warner, supra. The examiner’s decision is reversed. Reversed JOHN D. SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) CHUNG K. PAK ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) CHARLES F. WARREN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) - 3 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007