Appeal No. 95-0833 Application 08/161,978 the sidemost portion of the recess 100, i.e., in the position where the front wall portion 150 (see Figure 3) is present in a previously used cartridge (emphasis added). The language here indicates a correspondence between the initial description of Fig. 6 and that of Fig. 3, although it may have been better stated in such a manner to indicate that the front wall portion 150 of Fig. 3 would have been indicated to be a part of the prior art cartridge. The examiner’s new matter of objection under 35 U.S.C. § 132 and the basis of the current rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 112, relate to the language inserted at page 11, line 12 of the specification by amendment on March 3, 1994, with the current amended version of claim 10 on appeal: As will be apparent from the drawing, this sidemost portion of the opening 100 also can be detected by a drive sensor positioned either at the front or the side of the cartridge (emphasis added). Continuing in the same paragraph at page 11, lines 14 to 18 state the following: For the switch which determines write protection for a previously used cartridge, 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007