Appeal No. 95-1077
Application 07/965,647
otherwise. In re Piasecki, 745 F.2d 1468, 1472, 223 USPQ 785,
788 (Fed. Cir. 1984) (“[a]fter a prima facie case of
obviousness has been established, the burden of going forward
shifts to the applicant”).
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
JOHN D. SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) BOARD OF
PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007