Appeal No. 95-1199
Application 08/101,348
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
1-13, 24-26, 30, and 31. Claims 14, 16-20, 27-29 and 32-36
have
been indicated as allowable, and claims 15 and 21-23 have been
canceled.
Claim 1 reads as follows:
1. A bi-stable logic device comprising:
first and second inverters each said first and
second inverters including an input and an output;
a first resistor between the input of said first
inverter and the output of said second inverter;
a second resistor coupled between the input of said
second inverter and the output of said first inverter;
a capacitive coupling between the input of said
first inverter and the output of said first inverter such that
said first resistor isolates said capacitive coupling from the
output of said second inverter and said second resistor
isolates said capacitive coupling from the input of said
second inverter.
The Examiner’s Answer cites the following prior art:
Iizuka 4,532,609 July 30,
1985
OPINION
-2-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007