THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte MICHAEL J. KEOGH
and GEOFFREY D. BROWN
______________
Appeal No. 95-1211
Application 07/887,9041
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, WEIFFENBACH and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting
claims 1 through 17. Claims 12 through 15 have not been argued by appellants (principal brief, page 1)
and, thus, we dismiss the appeal as to these claims. Accordingly, only claims 1 through 11, 16 and 17
remain for our consideration on appeal. Claim 1 is illustrative of the claims on appeal:
1. An article of manufacture comprising (i) a plurality of electrical conductors having interstices
therebetween, each electrical conductor being surrounded by one or more layers of a mixture
comprising one or more polyolefins and the reaction product of (a) a functionalized hindered amine amic
1 Application for patent filed May 26, 1992.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007