THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RICHARD L. BRANDON
_____________
Appeal No.95-1250
Application 07/901,7221
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, WEIFFENBACH and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of
claims 1-3 and 17-24. In an amendment under 37 CFR § 1.116 filed December 17, 1993 (Paper No.
9), applicant canceled claims 17, 18, 22 and 23. In the Answer, for the first time the examiner states
that claim 24, added by an amendment filed August 24, 1993 (Paper No. 7) and rejected over prior
1 Application for patent filed June 22, 1992.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007