Appeal No. 95-1360
Application No. 08/134,002
550, makes a distinction between these two concepts:
“[R]eading a claim in the light of the
specification,” to thereby interpret limitations
explicitly recited in the claim, is a quite
different thing from “reading limitations of the
specification into a claim,” to thereby narrow the
scope of the claim by implicitly adding disclosed
limitations which have no express basis in the
claim. This distinction is difficult to draw . . .
.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007