Ex parte BODIAN et al. - Page 14




               Appeal No. 95-1364                                                                                                 
               Application No. 07/919,287                                                                                         


               matter.   The publications appear to  be available through interlibrary loan.   The state of the current record    
               precludes us from evaluating this rejection.                                                                       
                      Accordingly, we vacate the rejection of claims 1-6, 8-9, 12-17 and 23-26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103              
               and remand the application for further proceedings including properly including a copy of the Leach et al.         
               reference and consideration of the full text of the abstracted articles.                                           
               New Ground of Rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 2                                                                 
                      Claims 31-33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 2, as indefinite.  These claims are dependant            
               on claims 1, 14 and 27, respectively.  As such they are subject to the mandatory claim construction of  of         
               § 112, ¶ 4.  That paragraph provides in part:                                                                      
                              A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all                        
                              limitations of the claim to which it refers.                                                        
               Thus the limitation of claims 1, 14 and 27 must be read into claims 31-33.  Each of claims 1, 14 and 27            
                                1          2                                                                                      
               requires that “OX  AND OX  are simultaneously hydroxy.”  Claims  31-33 each include the limitation                 
                                   1          2                            4        4                                          
               “wherein one of OX  AND OX  is hydroxy and the other is OR  where R is saturated or unsaturated                    
               hydrocarbon of less than four carbons.”   Thus, claims 31-33 are internally inconsistent in simultaneously         
                                    1       2                                        1       2                                
               requiring (1) that OX  and OX  both be hydroxy and (2) that only one of OX  and OX  be hydroxy and                 
               the other be OR .  The inconsistency renders the subject matter of the claims 31-33 indefinite.4                                                                                                  
                      This decision contains a remand and a new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR §                          
               1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10,               
               1997), 1203 Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).  37 CFR § 1.196(b) provides                
               that, “A new ground of rejection shall not be considered final for purposes of judicial review.”  In addition      
               37 CFR § 1.196(e) provides that a decision which includes or allows a remand is not final for purposes             
               of judicial review.                                                                                                




                                                               14                                                                 





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007