Appeal No. 95-1405
Application 08/095,276
three pairs of limiters in the manner set forth at the end of
claim 28 on appeal.
In view of the foregoing, we have sustained the rejection
of claims 21 to 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 but have reversed the
rejection of claim 28 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Accordingly, the
decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
)
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007