THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte CHUNG-NIN CHAU, STEVEN C. FOWLER, JOHN S. TULK,
PAUL W. SALVI, TRACY V. SILLOWAY and KAREN LEE
__________
Appeal No. 95-1473
Application No. 07/997,2791
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of
claim 7. The only other claims remaining in the application,
which are claims 1 through 5 and 8, have not been appealed.
The subject matter on appeal relates to an aqueous coating
suspension for a fluorescent lamp comprising particles of an
1Application for patent filed December 23, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007