THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ATTILA BERECK, KLAUS FLORY AND MATTHIAS KUMMER
____________
Appeal No. 95-1506
Application No. 07/504,8811
____________
HEARD: October 14, 1998
____________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, GARRIS, and WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judges.
SOFOCLEOUS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 10 to 18. Claim 9 stands
withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-elected invention. Subsequent to
the final rejection, the examiner entered appellants’ amendments (Paper Nos. 15 and 19),
which substituted claim 19 for claim 10. Thus, claims 11 to 19 are all the claims before us
on this appeal.
1Application for patent filed April 5, 1990.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007