Paper No. 27 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte JOHN V. JOSEPH, MARK B. SHADOWENS, CRAIG W. THOMPSON and JOHN CHUNG-LIN CHEN ______________ Appeal No. 95-1599 Application 08/062,492 1 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge . DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 8 through 13 and 19 through 32. Application for patent filed May 14, 1993. According to appellants,1 this application is a continuation of Application 07/526,215, filed May 21, 1990. (Abandoned). 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007