THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ANTHONY MARFAT
and RALPH P. ROBINSON
_____________
Appeal No. 95-1618
Application 08/033,4561
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WEIFFENBACH and ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of
claims 1-6 and 8-13 which are all of the claims remaining in the application. We reverse.
1 Application for patent filed March 18, 1993. According to applicants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/960,208, filed October 13, 1992, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Application 07/846,756, filed
March 5, 1992, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Application 07/612,054, filed November 9, 1990, now
abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007