Appeal No. 95-1673
Application 08/039,552
characterized in that a first electrically conducting
auxiliary track is located parallel to and at a different
level than the second connecting track, in that one end of the
first auxiliary track is connected to the second connecting
track and the other end is connected to a portion of the
second connecting track which is connected to the second
winding, and in that a second auxiliary track is located
parallel to and at a different level than the first connecting
track, in that one end of the second auxiliary track is
connected to the first connecting
track and the other end is connected to a portion of the first
connecting track connected to the first winding.
The examiner relies on the following references:
Church et al. (Church) 4,219,854 Aug. 26, 1980
Matsumoto 4,672,495 June 9,
1987
Jones Jr. et al. (Jones) 4,713,711 Dec. 15,
1987
Imanaka et al. (Imanaka) 4,949,209 Aug. 14, 1990
Koyanagi et al. (Koyanagi) 5,065,270 Nov. 12, 1991
(Filed May 13, 1990)
Claims 1 through 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as unpatentable over Imanaka in view of Koyanagi and
Matsumoto. Claims 1 through 4 and 6 through 8 stand further
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Jones in
view of Church.
Reference is made to the brief and answer for the
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007