THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GYANENDRA GUPTA
____________
Appeal No. 95-1711
Application No. 08/063,8191
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WEIFFENBACH and PAK, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 17, 19, 21, 23 and 36-39.
Claim 17 is representative and reproduced
below:
1Application for patent filed May 20, 1993. According to
the appellant, the application is a division of Application
No. 07/780,684, filed October 18, 1991, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007