THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte PING-PEI HO
and ROBERT R. ALFANO
_____________
Appeal No. 95-1923
Application 08/051,9871
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, LEE and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claim 19, the only claim pending in appellants’
application.
The invention pertains to a multiple-stage optical gate. Claim 19 reads as follows:
1Application for patent filed April 26, 1993. According to appellants, this application is a
division of Application 07/784,220, filed October 30, 1991, now U.S. Patent No. 5,227,912,
granted July 13, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007