THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte STANLEY N. LAPIDUS
__________
Appeal No. 95-1950
Application 08/061,9281
__________
HEARD: Jun. 8, 1998
__________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS, and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed May 13, 1993. According
to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/884,622, filed May 15, 1992, now U.S. Patent
5,266,495, issued November 30, 1993; which is a continuation
of Application 07/487,637, filed March 2, 1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007