THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte RUEGER SCHLUND and BERNHARD RIEGER
________________
Appeal No. 95-1959
Application 07/894,1281
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, METZ and WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
METZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's refusal to allow claims 1 through 3 and 6 through
8, all the claims remaining in this application.
Application for patent filed June 4, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007