Appeal No. 95-2050
Application 07/888,098
Claims 8, 9, 21, and 22 depend from claims 3, 8, 17,
and 21 respectively and additionally recite updating the data
base by selecting a different set of destinations for current
operation. We fail to see how these recitations distinguish
over Bush any more than the claims from which they depend.
For the reasons presented above, the rejection of Claims 8, 9,
21, and 22 is sustained.
Claims 10 and 23
Claims 10 and 23 depend from claims 3 and 17
respectively and additionally recite establishment of a
communication path to a processor in communication with either
an integrated services control point or a control node. We
find that Bush’s disclosure of a “command routing database”
implies such a processor.
The rejection of claims 10 and 23 is sustained.
Claims 11, 12, 24, and 25
Claims 11, 12, 24, and 25 fall with the claims from
which they depend because appellants have presented no
argument for separate patentability. 37 CFR § 1.192.
-8-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007