Appeal No. 95-2111
Application 07/771,173
(5) The examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rejection of
claims 1 and 8 as anticipated by Vassiliadis is not sustained.
(6) The examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rejection of
claims 1-3 as anticipated by Davies is sustained.
(7) The examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of
claims 4-7 over Davies in view of Symonds is not sustained.
(8) The examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of
claims 9 and 10 over Vassiliades is not sustained.
(9) The examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of
claim 12 over Davies is not sustained.
No time period for taking subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
LAWRENCE J. STAAB )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
-16-
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007