Paper No. 22
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte WOLFGANG HENSELER,
MANFRED MULLER, EGON KATZ,
GUIDO WETZEL AND LUIGI BRAMBILLA
______________
Appeal No. 95-2124
Application 08/076,7891
_______________
HEARD: MARCH 3, 1998
_______________
Before COHEN, PATE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow
claims 3 and 5, the only remaining claims in the application.
The claimed invention is directed to an automotive airbag
which is encased in a central region by a synthetic film casing.
The casing is composed of a tough, plastically deformably
1Application for patent filed June 15, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007