THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte CHERYLYN LEE and LARRY F. CHARBONNEAU
__________
Appeal No. 95-2142
Application No. 07/996,4231
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before SCHAFER, OWENS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicants appeal from the final rejection of claims 21-41, all the claims in the application.
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.
The examiner entered two rejections:
1 Application for patent filed December 23, 1992. According to appellants, this
application is a division of Application 07/687,801, filed April 19, 1991, now U.S. Patent No.
5,204,443, issued April 20, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007