Ex parte WOLLER et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-2179                                                          
          Application No. 07/994,536                                                  

               Claim 1, which is illustrative of the subject matter on                
          appeal, reads as follows:                                                   
                                          1.                                          
               A wound dressing composition consisting essentially of:                
          from about 40 percent to 80 percent by weight of blended                    
               glycerin polyacrylate clatharate [sic, clathrate], and;                
          from about 10 percent to 50 percent of glycerin as a                        
          compatible,                                                                 
               non toxic [sic, nontoxic] polyhydric alcohol.                          
               The reference relied on by the examiner is:                            
          Georgalas et al. (Georgalas)       4,837,019         June 6, 1989           
               The issue presented for review is whether the examiner                 
          erred in rejecting claims 1 through 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103                
          as unpatentable over Georgalas.                                             
                                       OPINION                                        
               We shall not sustain this rejection.                                   
               First, 35 U.S.C. § 103 authorizes a rejection where to                 
          meet the claim, it is necessary to modify a single reference                
          or to combine it with one or more other references.  After                  
          indicating that the rejection is under 35 U.S.C. § 103, the                 
          examiner should set forth (1) the relevant teachings of the                 
          prior art relied on, (2) the difference or differences in the               



                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007