THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GREGORY M. JURSICH and WILLIAM A. VON DRASEK
____________
Appeal No. 95-2231
Application No. 08/114,2851
____________
HEARD: June 9, 1998
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WEIFFENBACH and PAK, Administrative
Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Jursich et al. (appellants) appeal from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 16 through 19, 21 through 24, 31 and
32, which are all of the claims pending in the application.
1Application for patent filed September 1, 1993.
According to the appellants, the application is a continuation
of Application 07/665,240, filed March 6, 1991, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007