THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 37
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte AKIO MISHIMA and NAOTO KOJIMA
____________
Appeal No. 95-2255
Application No. 07/962,0351
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS, and PAK, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection
of claims 3, 10 and 11. The only other claim remaining in the
1Application for patent filed October 15, 1992.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/651,610 filed February 6, 1991, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007