THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte NEIL H. MINGLEDORFF
__________
Appeal No. 95-2264
Application 08/125,7501
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before MEISTER, FRANKFORT and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to allow claims 5
through 9 and 11 through 22 as amended subsequent to the final rejection in papers
2
filed on June 27 and 29, 1994 (Paper Nos. 8 and 9). Claims 5 through 9 and 11
1Application for patent filed September 24, 1993.
2While the examiner has approved entry of the amendments filed under
37 CFR § 1.116, we note that these amendments have not as of yet been clerically
entered. This oversight should be corrected in any further prosecution before the
examiner.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007