THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte GERD KONRAD and HEINRICH HARTMANN
________________
Appeal No. 95-2269
Application No. 08/047,1591
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before WINTERS, OWENS and WEIMAR, Administrative Patent Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting
claim 22, which is the only claim remaining in the application.
The appealed claim reads as follows:
22. A water-thickening copolymer, consisting essentially of:
(a) from 85 to 99% by weight of acrylamide copolymerized
with
1Application for patent filed April 13, 1993. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation of Application
No. 07/716,732, filed June 17, 1991, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007