THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte JOHN E. JACKSON
and MARIANNE O. PRICE
______________
Appeal No. 95-2315
Application 07/917,6701
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal and Opinion
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting
claims 1, 3 through 5 and 9.2 Claims 10 through 19 are also of record and have been withdrawn from
consideration by the examiner.
We will not sustain either of the examiner’s grounds of rejection of the appealed claims under
35 U.S.C. § 103 over appellants’ admissions in their specification, Routsis, Wolfla et al. and McComas
1 Application for patent filed July 21, 1992. According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
application 07/729,154, filed July 12, 1991, now abandoned.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007