THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte THOMAS R. ANTHONY, ROBERT H.
ETTINGER and JAMES F. FLEISCHER
_____________
Appeal No. 95-2327
Application 08/119,4481
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before RONALD H. SMITH, WARREN and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RONALD H. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 24-27
and 30, all the pending claims in the application.
The subject matter relates to a method of producing a
diamond tube by chemical vapor deposition on a hollow mandrel.
1 Application for patent filed September 9, 1993. According to
appellants, the application is a continuation of Application 07/899,034, filed
June 15, 1992, which is a continuation of Application 07/783,457, filed October
24, 1991, which is a division of Application 07/694,170, filed May 1, 1991, now
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007