Ex parte ANTHONY et al. - Page 1




                                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                             
                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written                                                                         
                    for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                        
                                                                                                                        Paper No. 35                                       

                                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                      
                                                                        _____________                                                                                      
                                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                      
                                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                      
                                                                        _____________                                                                                      
                                                Ex parte THOMAS R. ANTHONY, ROBERT H.                                                                                      
                                                     ETTINGER and JAMES F. FLEISCHER                                                                                       
                                                                        _____________                                                                                      
                                                                   Appeal No. 95-2327                                                                                      
                                                              Application 08/119,4481                                                                                      
                                                                       ______________                                                                                      
                                                                             ON BRIEF                                                                                      
                                                                      _______________                                                                                      

                    Before RONALD H. SMITH, WARREN and WALTZ, Administrative Patent                                                                                        
                    Judges.                                                                                                                                                
                    RONALD H. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                          

                                                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                      
                              This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 24-27                                                                                   
                    and 30, all the pending claims in the application.                                                                                                     
                              The subject matter relates to a method of producing a                                                                                        
                    diamond tube by chemical vapor deposition on a hollow mandrel.                                                                                         

                              1    Application for patent filed September 9, 1993. According to                                                                            
                    appellants, the application is a continuation of Application 07/899,034, filed                                                                         
                    June 15, 1992, which is a continuation of Application 07/783,457, filed October                                                                        
                    24, 1991, which is a division of Application 07/694,170, filed May 1, 1991, now                                                                        
                    abandoned.                                                                                                                                             
                                                                                    1                                                                                      





Page:  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007