Appeal No. 95-2449
Application 08/011,120
forth at the specification of this application at page 4, line 17. Thus, on this record, the
prior art would have, at best, suggested a coating having a thickness of 7 mils.
Accordingly, we do not find that the examiner has properly established a prima facie
case of obviousness.
Having found that a prima facie case of obviousness does not exist, we need not
consider appellant’s declaration filed under 37 CFR § 1.132.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
William F. Smith )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Bradley R. Garris ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
Thomas A. Waltz )
Administrative Patent Judge )
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007