THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RONALD P. REITZ
____________
Appeal No. 95-2489
Application 07/826,2071
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, WEIFFENBACH and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Application for patent filed January 22, 1992. According to appellant, this Application is a continuation of Application1
07/599,162 filed October 17, 1990, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/219,523 filed July
15, 1988, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007