THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MIKIO MOTTATE,
MASAAKI ORIKASA
and
KIKUO NISHI
____________
Appeal No. 95-2721
Application No. 08/054,9271
____________
HEARD: May 5, 1998
____________
Before CALVERT, PATE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 16. Claim 17 has been allowed.
1Application for patent filed April 28, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007