Appeal No.95-2807
Application 07/944,653
Finally, we also cannot sustain the § 103 rejection of
dependent claims 7 and 8 inasmuch as neither Favrou nor
Takanosashi rectifies the deficiency of Toshimitsu as discussed
supra.
In summary, the examiner’s decision rejecting the appealed
claims is affirmed with respect to claims 1, 3 and 4, but is
reversed with respect to claims 5 through 8.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136 a.
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
HARRISON E. McCANDLISH )
Senior Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007