Appeal No. 95-2881 Application No. 07/988,037 its properties, which must have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. In re Antonie at 559 F.2d 619, 195 USPQ 8; In re Papesch, 315 F.2d 381, 390-391, 137 USPQ 43, 51 (CCPA 1963). For the above stated reasons, none of the many section 103 rejections advanced by the examiner on this appeal can be sustained. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED Michael Sofocleous ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) Bradley R. Garris ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) Chung K. Pak ) Administrative Patent Judge ) tdc 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007