Appeal No. 95-2925
Application 08/162,820
high engine temperature and low engine oil pressure) is not suggestive of the invention, when
considered with Pomerantz. There appears to be no suggestion in the prior art to display
sequentially only the highest level warning signals. Accordingly, we will not sustain the rejection
of claims 10 and 19.
Because dependent claims 11-15, 29 and 30 are rejected over the prior art applied against
independent claims 10 and 19 further in view of Kawasaki or Kawasaki and Yashima, the
rejection of these claims will not be sustained.
REVERSED
STANLEY M. URYNOWICZ, JR.)
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
) APPEALS AND
JAMESON LEE ) INTERFERENCES
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
JAMES T. CARMICHAEL )
Administrative Patent Judge )
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007