THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_________
Ex parte TATSUO NAKADA, HIROKAZU AOYAMA
and SATOSHI KOYAMA
__________
Appeal No. 95-2958
Application 08/108,5761
___________
HEARD: December 9, 1998
___________
Before WEIFFENBACH, ELLIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 1-3 and 8-17. Claims 4-7, which are the only other
1Application for patent filed September 3, 1993.
According to applicants, this application is a national stage
application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT/JP93/00027 filed
January 12, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007